If we change the definition of marriage to be more inclusive then it is logical to argue that we should broaden the definition so that won't exclude anyone. Topic: Marriage, Author: Jack Kingston Share Article: Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on Pinterest Share on Telegram Share on Whatsapp Copy Link
Previous Article Marriage is sacred and protected and has nothing to do with violating our civil rights.
Next Article But whether a couple is a man and a woman has everything to do with the meaning of marriage.
2 Obviously the anti-ERA people are tickled about my ordeal because it proves that the ERA breaks up families. When they point out that feminism is a dangerous thing I just say marriage is pretty precarious too.
3 In response to our fast-food culture a 'slow food' movement appeared. Out of hurried parenthood a move toward slow parenting could be growing. With vital government supports for state-of-the-art public child care and paid parental leave maybe we would be ready to try slow love and marriage.
4 Traditional marriage between a man and a woman has been a cornerstone of our society for generations. If we are going to change that it ought to be done by the will of the people.
